New York Nurse Exposes Hospital Through Undercover Footage

I recently saw a video with a nurse who was working at the Elmhurst hospital in Queens. Her name is Erin Marie Olszewski. She was brought from Florida - where she was successfully treating Covid positive patients - by a service funded by the Federal Emergency Management Agency. She was at Elmhurst Hospital for almost a month. What she saw while working there pushed her to become a whistleblower and to be a voice for the patients that were dying. At first she spoke through proxies but 3 weeks ago, she revealed she was the New York nurse blowing the whistle.

To give you a bit of her background and credentials lets start with how she enlisted in the army at 17. She was raised in Wisconsin before serving her country. In 2003, she was deployed in support of Operation Iraqi Freedom. Her duties included overseeing aid disbursement and improvements to hospital facilities. While in country, she received the Army Commendation Medal for meritorious service and she was wounded in combat. Eventually, Erin retired as a sergeant and became a civilian nurse in 2012.

What intrigued me right away about her is that she had hidden camera footage to back up what she was saying. I feel by her recording this footage, she has taken a great risk to herself and to her career. When one becomes a whistleblower there a few things we have to take into account of the person and their character: are they an attention seeker? Are they in it for monetary gain? Are they in it for notoriety and fame? What does this person have to gain by saying or exposing what they are exposing? And most importantly, what do they have to lose? Also, what do the people she’s accusing have to lose? And with that, how important would it be for them to discredit her and cover up what she is saying?

Whenever I share a whistleblower, I always investigate who they are as a person and ask those questions. From what I can tell thus far is that she has more to lose than gain by coming forward. She is exposing some serious shit that could get a lot of people into trouble if she is telling the truth. She is going against a huge industry that has had their hands in more controversies and cover-ups that I can count. This industry is a multi-billion industry and her footage could have a part in its ultimate collapse and most importantly the collapse of the lies they’ve been telling regarding the pandemic.

It would be easy to say she is making it up. To say that she is lying would mean that the proxy is lying, the footage she has is fabricated and someone is secretly paying her or coaxing her to do this. As of this publication, there is no evidence to support that. There is an agenda that goes much deeper than the virus and I think she has used her position as a nurse and what she has seen to add to that narrative and add to the evidence to contradict the official narrative. Let’s also keep in mind that she has served her country and has taken an oath not only while she was of service to her country but also an oath as a nurse. I think she is upholding the oaths she has taken. Below is the video titled, “Perspecitives of the Pandemic – The (Undercover) Epicenter Nurse – Episode 9"

Some people prefer to read rather than watch an hour long video so I’m going to summarize what she says.

• 60% - 90% of those who are put on vents die from lung trauma, not the virus. These patients are labelled that they died from the virus
• Patients with negative test results labelled as “Covid Confirmed”
• Elmhurst is a public hospital that was struggling financially before the pandemic but particularly while the pandemic was going on because all elective surgeries were cancelled
• There was a confirmed financial incentive for hospitals to diagnose their patients with Covid-19 as well as confirm their deaths were from the Coronavirus
• Patient is told that if they don’t go on a vent, they will die. Nurses note that there is a slim to none chance that they’ll walk out alive if they are placed on a vent
• Residents are practicing their skills on them. There is no accountability for mistakes. Mistakes are considered just another causality in the pandemic
• Half of the hospital is Covid positive, half is not
• Putting Covid positive patients in the same room as Covid negative patients. “They’re banking on the fact that they’ll get it cause they’re immune compromised.”
• Do not resuscitate orders without the patient’s or family’s consent
• ICU doctors who don’t know critical care (one is a dentist who is considered a “student.”)
• The hospital does have enough rooms to separate Covid positive from Covid negative but is choosing not to
• A rapid test takes 45 minutes, although it’s more expensive. Instead they do a 5 day test. In the meantime, patients become infected while waiting for their tests results
• Erin feels the “poor” patients are being treated as disposable
• Nurses were not using the PPE properly
• Residents are “order followers” and don’t question the orders, despite conflicts with their training and expertise
• “Higher ups” said DNR (do not resuscitate) to most patients even if the patient’s family said to do whatever they can to save their family member
• “There are a lot of nurses that know that this is wrong but they are afraid to say anything publicly.”
• “There are good doctors.” The good ones are outnumbered
• “Residents don’t view people as people anymore.”
• Patients don’t need to be put on a vent but doctors are pushing it
• “It’s murder.”
• “Everybody is scared to stick up for themselves.”
• People are sedated for a month and can not stick up for themselves or speak out about what is happening to them
• “Order followers, they want to please.”
• “If you tell people something enough, they’re going to start believing it.”
• Patients are separated from their families so there is no one monitoring their family member’s care, what is being done to them and has no one is advocating for them
• Paranoia is what brought most patients in, not actual symptoms
• Doctors trick and scare patients into being sedated and put onto a vent
• Hydroxychloroquine cures but it is being demonized. Governor of New York banned it. “He wants to be right.” There are rumors he has a financial stake in the pandemic and the vents. That is yet to be verified but his integrity is still being questioned
• Instead of focusing on something that could cure (hydroxychloroquine), funding is being put towards vents and a vaccine
• High does of Vitamin C is also helping
• How healthy a person is before depends on their probability of surviving being on the vent
• Patients acting out because they are being put on psyche meds without any need or diagnosis for them
• Soft restraints put on all patients
• Patients began to freak out after being restrained (who wouldn’t). Again, no family to advocate or monitor their family members care
• Erin’s theory is the hospital in New York did what it did because they were struggling financially and needed money

Her final message:

“If someone like me or anybody is trying to tell you something that might go against your beliefs, just listen! You know, like really just take it in and instead of jumping on it like think on it for a night or a day and look into this stuff and ask people about it. People are so quick to defend something they don’t really understand.”

The “Debunker”

I wanted to share a video of a doctor who tried to “debunk” her. I watch debunker videos mostly so I can see both sides to the story, so to speak. I came across a video by ZDoggMD. He’s a doctor who

no longer practices medicine. He is now a Youtuber and self-proclaimed rapper/musician who does parody videos and essentially makes fun of and mocks people, particularly those struggling with health problems. He also bashes nurses in one video I watched; just something interesting to note about him.

I wanted to go through his video and show he literally has nothing to back up what he is saying. He clearly uses emotions rather than facts and evidence to sway opinion.

Let’s begin…

He starts off by saying, “Before we did Plandemic – which was pretty obvious within 30 seconds of watching that video I detected crazy sauce all over it and I was just angry that anyone would have believed it.”

He starts off by saying while he was reviewing Plandemic, he found that after only thirty seconds of watching it, he detected “crazy sauce” all over it and he was immediately angry that people believed it. First off, you can not do a proper evaluation of something within 30 seconds. If you can, it shows you have confirmation bias. You are not looking for facts; you are looking for things that confirm your predetermined bias. He also says he was immediately angry which is him using emotion to prove his point rather than facts and actual information. Most people who are experiencing cognitive dissonance, become very emotional and will use name calling and become aggressive to defend their core beliefs. So right away, you can see that he isn’t looking to actively listen and understand what another person is presenting, he’s going in trying to disprove something right away, either for a hidden agenda or because he literally does not want to believe it. He absolutely can’t accept it. That is the first impression this guy gives.

“It takes awhile to figure out that this person is insane, but it does take time and you can use your critical thinking tool kit to actually debunk this systematically.”

He automatically labels her insane, which is setting up the dialogue and his rebuttal for the video. If he is someone that you trust and someone that you get information from, he has immediately programmed you from the first minute of watching his video. When I’m analyzing information or a person, I don’t call them names even if I do believe certain things, I’m not going to start off with that. He could say she gives the impression but he doesn’t, he just says she's insane.

“A lot of the things she talks about are things that I’ve seen: mismanagement, over treatment, financial incentives that don’t align with the actual care of the patient, not listening to patients wishes, those kinds of things. So I’m like already on her side, like I want to believe what she is saying and despite that, I don’t believe a single word that she says even though there is truth sprinkled through the video, conceptual truth.”

It’s interesting to note what he says here because he says he wants to believe her and he himself has seen certain things in the medical industry that are not in line with quality patient care but yet, she is still a liar although he has yet to present any evidence to prove she is in fact lying or fabricating what she is saying. What is interesting is that he does admit that these things do happen and as doctor he has witnessed it first hand. I feel he shot himself in the foot with that statement.

He talks about how he’s doing his video and giving you the run down so you don’t have to watch it. Right there should be a red flag. You should always watch what someone is telling you not to watch. Essentially, when they are telling you not to, they are saying you are too stupid to interpret it properly but don’t worry, he’s going to tell you what it’s all about and explain to you so that you don’t have to think for yourself.

“…decides she’s going to become an undercover reporter and videotape not just medical record charts which are shown in the video with minimal redaction…”

Not true, all personal, identifying information is redacted.

“The first thing to do is to look at your conspiracy checklist. Number one, is there a conspiracy theory that they are presenting? The answer is yes!”

By labeling something automatically as a conspiracy theory, he is automatically putting it into a category that it is a lie or unbelievable. The conspiracy he says that they are presenting is that there is a financial incentive to label someone as Covid positive.

“Yes, financial incentives do matter, yes that can influence care, is that what is going on here? Well we have no contrary voice in the video.”

If you are exposing something, especially something as explosive as labeling people Covid positive for monetary gain, you can’t necessarily interview the hospital because essentially they will deny it. In the video, the nurses talk about how this is happening. In my opinion, the video footage speaks for itself but also, the video makers did say they reached out to Elmhurst Hospital for comment but they have not responded. They also said if they did respond after the video was published, they would put their response in the description. As of the date of this publication, they have not responded. Their silence speaks volumes because if it was all untrue, you’d think they’d deploy some kind of PR to immediately deny the allegations, but haven’t. ZDogg is making it seem like they didn’t even try to give the hospital a voice, which they did and the hospital chose to stay silent instead of deny the allegations and the footage.

“We in healthcare know that this is probably not occurring you guys, because it would come out.”

It’s coming out… the proof is in her testimony.

He then goes on to say she is an anti-vaxxer to immediately discredit her. In fact, he calls her ‘Queen of the anti-vaxxers’ of course with zero evidence to support this. He says that she’s part of the “Florida something alliance” because he can’t exactly remember what it’s called and that it is an anti-vaccine/pro-personal choice site. So because of her involvement with this group (which on the video it states that she did co-found the ‘Florida Freedom Alliance’ but no longer has any connection with the organization), he’s saying that she already has an agenda. But what agenda would that be? Wouldn’t her coming out have something to do with vaccines and not the hidden camera footage that she’s showing? Not once in the video does she talk negatively about vaccines.“She’s been noted by scientific community before as being a vocal anti-vaxxer which already ought to disqualify you from being a nurse but in this case and in this country it doesn’t cause there’s this thing called freedom, I don’t know why!?”

Which scientific community? And he apparently doesn’t agree with freedom so there’s that. He says she denies that there’s a pandemic which she absolutely does not, and says multiple times in her video that she isn’t saying that Covid isn’t real. He goes on and on talking about “fake experts” when it’s pretty obvious he is one.

He continues to say that she is discrediting herself because she is “attacking the doctor” who was smirking and laughing while she (Erin) was advocating for her patients life. He also doesn’t use a single clip from the video to showcase what he is saying so that you can see that what he is saying is true. You’re essentially expected to take his word for it. When using my “critical thinking tool kit” as he calls it and how I analyze people and their intentions, it’s pretty easy to see that he fits the criteria for an attention seeker, someone who is out for monetary gain and fame and could possibly be suffering from cognitive dissonance. That’s all I’m going to pick apart from his video. If you want, you can watch it and make your own decision. When it comes to "debunkers" be careful what you believe. I've found that many of them have an agenda and are not about revealing the truth, but are more about covering for the lie.

Always look at what you're being told not to look at and make your own decision. Her testimony is explosive and rather alarming and I feel it's something that everyone should look at. Think what you want about it, I’m not telling you to believe it. I’m just asking you to look at it, what you think about it is up to you. I have felt for awhile now that something else is going on. Something bigger than a virus and there is more than ample amount of evidence to prove this of you are willing to look and have an open mind.